eosin: (Default)
[personal profile] eosin
I've got a number of friends, online and IRL, who fall into the category of 'loveable ditz'. That is to say, they are good-hearted people who blindly follow an extreme ideology, because they substitute good intentions for critical thinking skills. No, this isn't limited to a single ideology, and this does not include people who actually think about the real-world consequences of decisions. It's the people who intentionally limit their circle of friends and media sources so as not to have any uncomfortable cognitive dissonance. But hey, they mean well. :/

They can be quite annoying, although the really loveable ones work tirelessly for the benefit a certain group of people or cause, so one is left with the bittersweet combination of seeing almost saintlike dedication along with the horrifying knowledge of what results from their efforts. This means that sometimes one can chuckle when they spin their wheels at some truly useless endeavor, but that quickly turns to disrespect and disgust when they have some power and try to produce either some totalitarian horror from the past, or else the chaos and resulting misery of real anarchy. Rational people will avoid either of those two situations.

I'm actually subscribed to some left-wing, right-wing, and libertarian mailing lists, so I can see what's going on, and get a more nuanced perspective on important current issues. This has brought a lot of clarity, although some logical conclusions will probably scare the piss out of some people if they heard just blunt summaries. Good decisions require rational thought and the discipline to follow through with a plan. How to prevent getting stuck in an ideology? Listen to counter arguments; it will either point out mistakes which can be addressed, or it will reinforce what you already know, thus sharpening your arguments either way. This will help avoid the 'McGovern' syndrome. When McGovern lost in a landslide for Nixon in 1972, many journalists said out loud "I don't understand it--everyone I know voted for McGovern." They were right, as they were so limited in social and media circles that they lost touch with everyone else who thought differently.

Date: 2010-02-22 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vanirpriestess.livejournal.com
I tend to refrain from talking about politics on any public or semi-public fora because it always ends badly. Number one, most of my friends are either much farther left or much farther right of me and I'm politically unclassifiable enough that there's something in my views to piss off everyone. Number two, I have become less about politics and more about preparedness because no matter who wins, the government gets elected and it won't save us :)

I do know a number of people I disagree with on issues but they tend to be very mild about it - the occasional invite to some Facebook cause or the occasional mention of voting for so-and-so doesn't bother me so much. It is when lovable twit becomes self-righteous-and-preachy twit that I find I have far less tolerance than I used to. I don't like religious preaching, and I dislike political preaching about as much. People who come from a place of judgment with my lifestyle choices will find themselves speaking to deaf ears soon enough.

Date: 2010-02-22 07:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] winterlion.livejournal.com
good approach :)
I do try to do similar....


eosin: (Default)
The Pedantic Swordsman

March 2013


Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 22nd, 2017 02:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios